<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pork Barrel TV     SEARCH:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://porkbarrel.tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://porkbarrel.tv</link>
	<description>Documenting Waste and Mismanagement In The U.S. Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Debt Ceiling Trickery ( Or, How To Vote Without Voting )</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/debt-ceiling-trickery-or-how-to-vote-without-voting</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/debt-ceiling-trickery-or-how-to-vote-without-voting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Ceiling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I understand it, along with the debt ceiling increase congress voted on several months ago, legislation was also passed allowing for an automatic increase in the debt ceiling after an additional six months have passed, unless congress specifically votes to nullify the increase. So, congress essentially gave itself a pass, a &#8220;Who, me?&#8221; moment, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, along with the debt ceiling increase congress voted on several months ago, legislation was also passed allowing for an automatic increase in the debt ceiling after an additional six months have passed, unless congress specifically votes to nullify the increase.</p>
<p>So, congress essentially gave itself a pass, a &#8220;Who, me?&#8221; moment, allowing for additional spending, additional debt, without all of the discussions and public awareness that accompanied the previous debt ceiling increase.</p>
<p>How convenient for them.</p>
<p>There are no fiscal conservatives in congress anymore, there just aren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/debt-ceiling-trickery-or-how-to-vote-without-voting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear White House, I Would Like My $500,000,000 Back.</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/dear-white-house-i-would-like-my-500000000-back</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/dear-white-house-i-would-like-my-500000000-back#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solyndra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Washington Post, emails from the White House to the Office of Management and Budget show the White House repeatedly asking when they would be able to announce the loan for Solyndra at a scheduled event. The implication being that perhaps the White House attempted to push the loan through in order to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-pushed-500-million-loan-to-solar-company-now-under-investigation/2011/09/13/gIQAr3WbQK_print.html">Washington Post</a>, emails from the White House to the Office of Management and Budget show the White House repeatedly asking when they would be able to announce the loan for Solyndra at a scheduled event.  The implication being that perhaps the White House attempted to push the loan through in order to capitalize on an announcement of the loan.</p>
<p>In it&#8217;s defense, the White House states that the emails show only that they are interested in the loan and wanted more information from the OMB.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see if the White House manages to distance itself from this particular fiasco.  </p>
<p>This is exactly, precisely, specifically why it is not a good idea to rush money through congress like Bush did near the end of his second term and Obama/Reid/Pelosi did through the first two years of Obama&#8217;s first term.</p>
<p>How much more scandal will be uncovered?  One shudders to think of the waste, fraud and overall system abuse that will be revealed from the trillions of dollars Obama has spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/dear-white-house-i-would-like-my-500000000-back/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Is A Job Not A Job?</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/when-is-a-job-not-a-job</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/when-is-a-job-not-a-job#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is taking the phrase &#8216;stay the course&#8217; way too seriously. Temporary jobs, jobs that are only funded by the government for a short time are a waste of taxpayer money. While it is true that there is some modicum of return, in the sense that a new bridge is a new bridge, the fundamental [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is taking the phrase &#8216;stay the course&#8217; way too seriously.  Temporary jobs, jobs that are only funded by the government for a short time are a waste of taxpayer money.</p>
<p>While it is true that there is some modicum of return, in the sense that a new bridge is a new bridge, the fundamental truth of the matter is that funding for the creation of the bridge goes away much too soon to cause significant long term income streams.</p>
<p>Additionally, the net effect of creating temporary jobs while taxing the alleged &#8216;wealthy&#8217; to pay for the pork barrel projects causes a net loss of jobs: job creators have less money to work with, and as such create fewer long term career-oriented positions.</p>
<p>It is just my opinion, of course, but a job that is &#8216;created&#8217; via temporary funds paid for by taxes levied on job creators is NOT a real job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/when-is-a-job-not-a-job/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain Insults His Colleagues</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/john-mccain-insults-his-colleagues</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/john-mccain-insults-his-colleagues#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain Hobbits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not enough that the Tea Party members &#8211; those congressmen elected to office by promising to reduce spending along with the size of government &#8211; have to face malicious slurs from the media and liberals in general, but now members from the GOP ( perhaps in name only ) have taken it a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not enough that the Tea Party members &#8211; those congressmen elected to office by promising to reduce spending along with the size of government &#8211; have to face malicious slurs from the media and liberals in general, but now members from the GOP ( perhaps in name only ) have taken it a step further.</p>
<p>John McCain, obviously frustrated with the conservatives unrelenting insistance that the debt ceiling not be raised and that spending be reeled in, took to the floor to refer to his party colleagues as hobbits:</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d7GfPEtyQsE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Mr. McCain, perhaps you have lost your sense of vitality, your can-do attitude, but that is no reason to insult others who still have the political will to reach for the stars.  Shame on you first, for attempting to insult them, and second for using a really poor analogy.  Seriously, that was 1 out of 5 stars.</p>
<p>And, just as a passing note, if you might recall, hobbits, in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, kicked some pretty serious hiney.  Mr. McCain, since we are on the topic of analogies, I also wanted to mention to you that you remind me of Popeye sans spinach.  I hope someday you find a can of spinach and reinvigorate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/john-mccain-insults-his-colleagues/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress STILL Doesn&#8217;t Get It</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/congress-still-doesnt-get-it</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/congress-still-doesnt-get-it#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The average American taxpayer has been demanding that congress reduce the deficit for years. Congresses response? Lift the debt ceiling by 2.4 trillion, and continue to allows this country&#8217;s finances to spiral down into oblivion. Personally, although the short term results would be detrimental to our economy, I hope our rating gets reduced to AA. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average American taxpayer has been demanding that congress reduce the deficit for years.  Congresses response?  Lift the debt ceiling by 2.4 trillion, and continue to allows this country&#8217;s finances to spiral down into oblivion.</p>
<p>Personally, although the short term results would be detrimental to our economy, I hope our rating gets reduced to AA.  That may be the only way to take money out of the hands of congress &#8211; by making it too expensive for them to continue spending unabated.</p>
<p>I do hope that Obama sends flowers to all of the Republicans he has been insulting lately, because he sure owes them a thank you.  By allowing him to shove the debt ceiling discussion out past 2012, he now has a much improved chance of getting re-elected.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t understand how idiots keep getting re-elected to congress.  How does that happen?  We, as a nation, need to stop settling for less, because we deserve so much more from our leadership than what we have been getting.</p>
<p>More later, right now, I&#8217;m going to go get some breakfast while I can still afford to buy cereal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/congress-still-doesnt-get-it/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin Nails It</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/sarah-palin-nails-it</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/sarah-palin-nails-it#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a July 9th, 2011 note on facebook, Sarah Palin states exactly what is wrong with the current administration&#8217;s policies and what Obama needs to do in order to begin getting our economy back on track. Her post, which she entitled, &#8220;The Sugar Daddy Had Run Out Of Money&#8221; relentlessly rams home the point that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a July 9th, 2011 note on facebook, Sarah Palin states exactly what is wrong with the current administration&#8217;s policies and what Obama needs to do in order to begin getting our economy back on track.  Her post, which she entitled, &#8220;<a href="http://www.facebook.com/#!/note.php?note_id=10150235296718435">The Sugar Daddy Had Run Out Of Money</a>&#8221; relentlessly rams home the point that the United States cannot afford to continue to spend money that we simply do not have.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good read, check it out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/sarah-palin-nails-it/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wow, Just wow&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/wow-just-wow</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/wow-just-wow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Al Sharpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al sharpton socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brad ellsworth socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/w7JNbauwGPY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/w7JNbauwGPY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/wow-just-wow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Bill&#8217;s Fatal Flaw</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/health-care-bills-fatal-flaw</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/health-care-bills-fatal-flaw#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/health-care-bills-fatal-flaw</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch the latest news video at video.foxnews.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4119676&#038;w=400&#038;h=249"></script><noscript>Watch the latest news video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/health-care-bills-fatal-flaw/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal Democrat Brad Ellsworth Votes To Betray His Constituents</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/liberal-democrat-brad-ellsworth-votes-to-betray-his-constituents</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/liberal-democrat-brad-ellsworth-votes-to-betray-his-constituents#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[brad ellsworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal brad ellsworth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On friday, March 19, 2010, Ellsworth finally shed his sheep&#8217;s clothing and exposed himself for the liberal wolf that he is, and announced he will vote for liberal President Obama&#8217;s socialistic takeover of healthcare. In spite of the fact that his constituents are solidly against the bill, in spite of the fact that doctors oppose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On friday, March 19, 2010, Ellsworth finally shed his sheep&#8217;s clothing and exposed himself for the liberal wolf that he is, and announced he will vote for liberal President Obama&#8217;s socialistic takeover of healthcare.</p>
<p>In spite of the fact that his constituents are solidly against the bill, in spite of the fact that doctors oppose the bill, in spite of the fact that the United States of America has no money to FUND the bill, Mr. Ellsworth decided it was more important to engender approval from his Democrat leadership and vote against the wishes of his constituents.</p>
<p>One can only hope that he manages to somehow solve the Obama initiated depression before 2011 arrives, because Mr. Ellsworth will undoubtably be looking for a new job.</p>
<p>I wonder if, on sunday, Mr. Ellsworth will be humming, &#8220;Take This Job And Shove It&#8221; as he casts his vote to spend our country into oblivion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/liberal-democrat-brad-ellsworth-votes-to-betray-his-constituents/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Few Thoughts About Evan Bayh</title>
		<link>http://porkbarrel.tv/a-few-thoughts-about-evan-bayh</link>
		<comments>http://porkbarrel.tv/a-few-thoughts-about-evan-bayh#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porkbarrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evan Bayh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://porkbarrel.tv/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been ticked off at Mr. Bayh over the last year. It just seems like he has spent the last year ruining the reputation that he has built over his lifetime. From his years as Governor, where he managed the finances admirably and Indiana had a positive cash flow, through his years as a moderate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been ticked off at Mr. Bayh over the last year.  It just seems like he has spent the last year ruining the reputation that he has built over his lifetime.  From his years as Governor, where he managed the finances admirably and Indiana had a positive cash flow, through his years as a moderate Democrat, he always appeared to me to be the kind of Politician we needed to represent us.</p>
<p>Yet, for the last year, he has voted the liberal party line all the way down the ticket, and most of us independants have been wondering where the old Evan had gone to.</p>
<p>So, when he announced that he would not run for office again, it gave me pause to reflect upon what this might mean.</p>
<p>Given that 2010 looks to be a pretty tough year for Democrats, it is possible that he simply decided he did not want to risk losing with all the other Democrats.  Yet, he has always had a base of support here, people who look upon him fondly.  I would be willing to bet there are more &#8216;Evan&#8217;s per capita in Indiana than in any other state, and in fact, that&#8217;s the name of my youngest child.</p>
<p>I think it goes deeper than a simple election, though, and I doubt it will be anything that he will ever talk about openly.  I believe that Mr. Bayh has deep misgivings about the direction that the current Democrat leadership is taking this country, and I would be willing to bet that, had he the opportunity to do it all over, he would have voted against the stimulus bill in January, 2009.  Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I remember the old Mr. Bayh, the one that would not accept an Indiana budget that was not balanced.</p>
<p>So, Mr. Bayh, I&#8217;m going to give you a pass, for now.  I had planned on taking you to task for your votes last year, I had even decided to vote against you when the opportunity presented itself down the road.</p>
<p>But, I&#8217;m going to wait and see how you finish out your term, now, and hope that the old Mr. Bayh re-emerges.  I&#8217;ve said it before, and now i will clarify myself; I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing the old Mr. Bayh run for the highest office in the land.  He sure would have gotten the Republicans involved, and there is no doubt he would kept the liberal fanatics in check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://porkbarrel.tv/a-few-thoughts-about-evan-bayh/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

